City Creek Update

I’ve been criticized in the past for suggesting that the LDS church’s City Creek Mall project was going over its estimated budget, which was supposed to be between $750 million and $1.5 billion. Some had speculated that the costs could soar as high as $8 billion. As of today, KSL (the church-owned television station here in Utah) reports that the church has spent $5 billion.

http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=19428181&title=a-look-inside-as-city-creek-centers-completion-nears&s_cid=featured-1

Of course, the project isn’t entirely finished, but it seems we have a solid number at last.

7 Responses to City Creek Update

  1. Diane Sower says:

    This is so weird, because in any other state you don’t have the church owning and operating such huge business interests. It’s like I have an automatic disconnect to it, because I’ve never been exposed to it.

  2. jeanikins says:

    They owned up to $5 million it said on the news, yet in the first blog from you about this disgraceful use of money for a church claiming to love the Lord and his children, you wrote $3 billion. Was that a mistake or is there an explanation?

  3. […] sensitive topic than a scientific discussion of DNA, for example. The faithful are trying to defend the mall, but it’s kinda […]

  4. Odell says:

    $5 billion widow’s mites would feed a lot of hungry people, provide shelter to the homeless, educate those who thirst for knowledge, and provide medical services to those who suffer.

    I think it is shameful that the LDS Church used such signficant resources to build a commercial enterprises, even if those monies weren’t derived from tithing.

    I get frustrated when LDS Church defend their actions by arguing that the monies weren’t donated. Instead, their focus should have been on the better uses of the money – whereever and however derived.

  5. Odell says:

    One more comment. The article says that Bishop David Burton could shed tears about the realization of such a vision? These people consider themselves Christians?

Leave a comment